- Digital camera utility 5 vs digital camera utility 4 software#
- Digital camera utility 5 vs digital camera utility 4 Pc#
- Digital camera utility 5 vs digital camera utility 4 free#
- Digital camera utility 5 vs digital camera utility 4 windows#
Its a shame canon wont allow its customers an accurate way to read shutter count. Only Canon repair centres can provide shutter count for these models actually. If someone want to know the number of actuation on a recent camera, he must send his camera to Canon service centre. So, the shutter actuations reading is not supported any more due to firmware limitations. Canon has removed some functions from there recent cameras DSLR like 80D and 5D mark IV. The second subversion, using SDK 3.5, is for camera with digic6/6+ and newer, however it doesn't support retrieving the shutter actuations. This is a shame, buyers of older models in particular have a need to verify shutter count. Only Canon repair centres can provide accurate shutter readings for these models. EOS M (mirrorless) models are also not supported. DIGIC II and dual DIGIC III cameras are not supported. I released tow subversion, one use the Canon SDK 2.14 is for camera with Digic IV, and 5/5+. The Canon Digital Camera SDKs is freely available on this official link: I uses an official Canon SDK (Canon ED-SDK) to retrieve and set all camera information (shutter count is retrieved via an undocumented function). But it does not support this features: Editing the owner/artist/copyright and synchronizing date/time within the local PC's date/time.įor that, I wrote a new utility that includes all these features by integrating those that were missing. They provide some details about the camera, including product Name, firmware version, battery level, shutter Counter, date/time, and owner/artist/copyright strings.
Digital camera utility 5 vs digital camera utility 4 free#
However, there are a few free tools that may help you to do this. Theres no official Canon based application to find the shutter count for an EOS DSLR. Generate a complete report as a small text file and Jpeg screenshot.Ĭanon doesnt have shutter count included on the EXIF information of an image file, as opposed to Nikon and Pentax.
Digital camera utility 5 vs digital camera utility 4 Pc#
ĝevice date/time (read & synchro within local PC date/time). ğirmware Version (read) + link if available to canon web site. Ĝamera Model (read) + link if available to canon web site. This program can retrieve and edit if possible these infos: Informations can be read from a USB-connected camera and it provides accurate data that cannot be attainable by for example reading the EXIF.
Digital camera utility 5 vs digital camera utility 4 windows#
PDCU4 may be an exception - I haven't used it recently but IIRC it tends to try to preview every image in a directory when you point it to an image, which can slow things down when all you want to do is work on that specific image.The utility is for windows users, is free and will work on most recent Canon EOS Digital Cameras (models since 2010). I run these things on an old windows XP machine, and I find they are easier on system resources than PE9. There are some aspects of it that I like very much, now that I've figured it out. The interface takes some getting used to, not because it's poorly designed, but because it's different (ie. I don't think it recognizes things like custom image settings - it's more of a general purpose RAW converter, not something customized to Pentax cameras. It's not quite as powerful as newer versions ( which I've used as 30 day trials ), but it does work ( unfortunately, it has been "crippled" so it only recognizes RAW images from the Pentax cameras that it comes with - it WON'T recognize images shot with Pentax cameras that are supplied with PDCU ). The Silkypix you get with some Pentax cameras is an old version 3 of their commercial product ( I got one with my K30 ). This might be why PDCU "understands" things like your cameras custom image settings, and seems to make it easy to render an image that matches the JPG you get straight out of the camera without a huge amount of tweaking.
Digital camera utility 5 vs digital camera utility 4 software#
It's just a hunch, but I get the feeling that these utilities are based on the software that's actually in the cameras ( made by Silkypix? ), with the addition of a not-so-great UI. I won't ditch Silkypix totallyI've played with PDCU 3 ( which came with my K200D ), and PDCU 4.